Tuesday, 29 April 2014
Overseas Pakistanis Finally Get News They Are Waiting For
LAHORE – The government is considering establishing an authorised Commission for Overseas Pakistanis to cater complains of Pakistanis worldwide.
Irked over the slow bureaucratic tactics at Pakistan embassies and in the country, overseas Pakistanis have always demanded to empower them to play their role for the uplift of the country.
Chaudhry Muhammad Sarwar, governor of Punjab while talking with official news agency of the country, APP, said that expatriates, majority of them, settled across the world were facing hardships in redressal of their grievances regarding their properties and other matters in Pakistan.
He hinted at a full-fledged secretariat of the proposed commission at Lahore, the provincial capital, which will be governed by an Overseas Pakistanis Commissioners Punjab.
This will provide one-roof services to overseas Pakistanis, Sarwar, who hailed from United Kingdom to take the charge as governor, said.
Monday, 28 April 2014
Thursday, 24 April 2014
Monday, 21 April 2014
Sunday, 20 April 2014
Saturday, 19 April 2014
Friday, 18 April 2014
Thursday, 17 April 2014
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
Transfer Files from Computer to Smartphone via Wi-Fi
firstly You Download the Any send Software. If you want to download then http://www.getanysend.com/
This Software easily to use in PC
Tuesday, 15 April 2014
Indian meddling in Bangladesh
Slowly but surely attaining competencies to initiate and implement foreign policy and security interests on its own behalf, India embarks on elaborating an essentially postmodernist policy approach that emphasizes civil, moral, political and normative instruments and goals. Basically ideational endeavor has to perform in an imperfect material world, where numerous vices of nation states continue to disguise themselves in apparently virtuous, but in essence hypocritical and selfish, foreign and security policy stances.
Worried at the deteriorating political crisis in Bangladesh, where foreign diplomats based in Dhaka transformed their call for resolving differences through dialogue and peaceful means to hold a free and fair election, India attempts to integrate hard power components for its security interests and argues that while their consolidation may force and redraw its international image, the fundamental principles of India’s world policy approach will remain basically intact. So they would like to survive their interest in the Bangladesh from the different corner as like economic or political arena. India has chosen of their own motivated government in the Bangladesh who will cooperate with them for their real demands as like Tipaimuk Dam or Farakka Barrage.
BDR Mutiny and Insightful Benefit for India:
We all know about the incident of 2001, when BSF attacked in the Roumari, Rangpur but due to the brave role of BDR, BSF was frustrated. We also know about the previous regime of the Bangladesh and at that time there was no scope for drug business or any other prohibited Indian activities on the border to induce BDR into action. After the liberation war, India would have liked to maintain the same border security force led by BSF but at that time Mujib Government had rejected this plan. So India waited for the revenge on the BDR, which in insight and reflection is BDR mutiny. By this mutiny India is at most advantageous position for their future interest in the Bangladesh, which is security or political interest. India vastly hit on the Bangladesh Army and BDR especially in the security sector of Bangladesh. After the 2009 BDR mutiny, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina telephoned India’s external affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee, seeking assistance from the international community, The Hindu reported, citing a leaked US embassy cable. Though Hasina had not been specific about the kind of help she needed, Pranab Mukherjee had offered “to be responsive” if needed and the Indian government had also rallied London, Beijing and Tokyo. On March 26, 2009, the US Embassy in Delhi cabled (198952: confidential) that India’s main concern was to stabilize Prime Minister Hasina’s government, according to an article in The Hindu. On 5th November 2013, the Dhaka Metropolitan Sessions Court sentenced 152 people to death and 159 to life imprisonment; another 235 people received sentences between three and ten years for their involvement in the mutiny. The court also released 277 people who had been charged for the Second World War as punishment, known as Nuremburg Tribunal for the German military. A Human Rights Watch spokesperson described the mass trial as “an affront to international legal standards. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay has drawn attention to flaws in the trial, calling it “rife with procedural irregularities, including the lack of adequate and timely access to lawyers”. A spokesperson for Amnesty International condemned the sentences, stating that they “seem designed to satisfy a desire for cruel revenge.” We lost 57 Army officers and at least 70 BDR died while in custody. So what we need to know is who get the benefit and who is the real culprit of this mutiny, for whose interest this mutiny has been orchestrated? Those questions are rising in the people’s mind of Bangladesh.
We all know about the incident of 2001, when BSF attacked in the Roumari, Rangpur but due to the brave role of BDR, BSF was frustrated. We also know about the previous regime of the Bangladesh and at that time there was no scope for drug business or any other prohibited Indian activities on the border to induce BDR into action. After the liberation war, India would have liked to maintain the same border security force led by BSF but at that time Mujib Government had rejected this plan. So India waited for the revenge on the BDR, which in insight and reflection is BDR mutiny. By this mutiny India is at most advantageous position for their future interest in the Bangladesh, which is security or political interest. India vastly hit on the Bangladesh Army and BDR especially in the security sector of Bangladesh. After the 2009 BDR mutiny, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina telephoned India’s external affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee, seeking assistance from the international community, The Hindu reported, citing a leaked US embassy cable. Though Hasina had not been specific about the kind of help she needed, Pranab Mukherjee had offered “to be responsive” if needed and the Indian government had also rallied London, Beijing and Tokyo. On March 26, 2009, the US Embassy in Delhi cabled (198952: confidential) that India’s main concern was to stabilize Prime Minister Hasina’s government, according to an article in The Hindu. On 5th November 2013, the Dhaka Metropolitan Sessions Court sentenced 152 people to death and 159 to life imprisonment; another 235 people received sentences between three and ten years for their involvement in the mutiny. The court also released 277 people who had been charged for the Second World War as punishment, known as Nuremburg Tribunal for the German military. A Human Rights Watch spokesperson described the mass trial as “an affront to international legal standards. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay has drawn attention to flaws in the trial, calling it “rife with procedural irregularities, including the lack of adequate and timely access to lawyers”. A spokesperson for Amnesty International condemned the sentences, stating that they “seem designed to satisfy a desire for cruel revenge.” We lost 57 Army officers and at least 70 BDR died while in custody. So what we need to know is who get the benefit and who is the real culprit of this mutiny, for whose interest this mutiny has been orchestrated? Those questions are rising in the people’s mind of Bangladesh.
War Crimes Trails and India’s Interest:
Many international observers are of the view that the war crime tribunal’s governing law defines the offence of ‘crimes against humanity’ without a number of basic elements that are required in international law. So many lawyers of victims have also criticized the lack of preparation time they have been given for the trial and questioned the legislation that requires them to provide the prosecution all the witness statements in support of their client right at the beginning of the trial.
Many international observers are of the view that the war crime tribunal’s governing law defines the offence of ‘crimes against humanity’ without a number of basic elements that are required in international law. So many lawyers of victims have also criticized the lack of preparation time they have been given for the trial and questioned the legislation that requires them to provide the prosecution all the witness statements in support of their client right at the beginning of the trial.
The opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party issued a statement calling the tribunal a ‘rubber-stamping body, and accused it of being “an illegal and unconstitutional process for extra-judicial persecution of political opponents.” Whilst legitimate concerns about the tribunal exist, that would appear to be nothing in the tribunal’s governing law or current practice that justifies such trenchant criticism. Indeed as stated above it is an improvement in many ways from most domestic trials.
Meanwhile, war crime trials held by the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh, set up in 2009 to try accused of committing atrocities during the 1971 war against Pakistan, have targeted opposition leaders on the wish of India. Especially, India thinks that Jamaat-e-Islami is one of the anti-Indian parties in Bangladesh. So by the name of war crimes trials, the leader of Jamaat was hanged so that no anti-political party in Bangladesh in future is an impediment for Indian security and political interest. When there is a crime there should be a punishment and the government is doing its job. Now what is interesting is that how they see India in everything or indo-phobia. India has indulged in many internal problems of Bangladesh for their own interest.
Impending Election and Hard Power’s Arrival from India:
We all are concerned about the article carried by the Times of India which wrote by Subir Bhaumik on the issue of “Bangladesh is in a violent phase and India must do all it can to see a friendly regime return to power”, which has been written with a myopic vision, going into state of denial over the present political realities in Bangladesh. He has urged New Delhi to militarily intervene in Bangladesh to keep the Awami League in power so that the BNP and its allies do not assume power! The article would have been trashed except for the paper that carried it. It is frequently called that the Times of India is not just any newspaper rather it is an opinion maker in New Delhi. So it is unbelievable that why it published this article. India’s leading newspaperhas encouraged New Delhi to intervene in small neighboring states militarily so that there may not be democratic elections and a regime that serves its interests would retain power for the foreign policy and security interest of India.
We all are concerned about the article carried by the Times of India which wrote by Subir Bhaumik on the issue of “Bangladesh is in a violent phase and India must do all it can to see a friendly regime return to power”, which has been written with a myopic vision, going into state of denial over the present political realities in Bangladesh. He has urged New Delhi to militarily intervene in Bangladesh to keep the Awami League in power so that the BNP and its allies do not assume power! The article would have been trashed except for the paper that carried it. It is frequently called that the Times of India is not just any newspaper rather it is an opinion maker in New Delhi. So it is unbelievable that why it published this article. India’s leading newspaperhas encouraged New Delhi to intervene in small neighboring states militarily so that there may not be democratic elections and a regime that serves its interests would retain power for the foreign policy and security interest of India.
From the different diplomatic arena, upcoming elections of Bangladesh should be free and fair by participation of multiple parties. Washington’s page is clear, they wants a free, fair and inclusive national elections. The US Secretary John Kerry has written letters to the two leaders to this effect. Therefore, if Washington and New Delhi were on different pages, it would mean India supports an autocratic type of election in Bangladesh for their economic, political, foreign policy and security interests. So this is high time for Bangladeshi people to wake up because the sovereignty of the country is under threat. Source: Daily Mail
Author is a professor in the Department of Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Dhaka.
Monday, 14 April 2014
Sunday, 13 April 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)